Arguing in real time
Details of those dramas seeped out years or decades later.
Biskupic has reported Roberts is willing to uphold Mississippi’s law that would ban abortion at 15 weeks of pregnancy, which is in line with some European countries, as a middle ground.
“It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives,” Alito writes in the draft opinion.
The question now is whether another conservative on the court — Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh or Amy Coney Barrett — might disagree.
What was the release of the draft meant to accomplish?
“Is the leak designed to get (Kavanaugh) to change his mind or designed to make sure he does not change his mind?” wondered John King on CNN on Tuesday. “That’s one of the mysteries as we watch this play out.” Some experts have wondered if Kavanaugh might be the most likely to switch sides.
King’s question is valid, and it will be all the more intriguing if this draft opinion does not come to be. The court’s formal ruling is not expected to be published until late June.
The unexpected release of the draft opinion, however, is a subplot to the larger issue of a court willing to remake the social landscape of the country.
These justices used to view Roe v. Wade as precedent
In the draft opinion, Alito unleashes on the Roe decision as “egregiously wrong.”
Some Republicans must feel betrayed
Many Republicans who have worked for this moment are elated.
Perhaps Collins should have simply paid a bit more attention. What justices like Alito and Kavanaugh said about precedent in their confirmation hearings seemed to contradict their earlier views as government lawyers. Now those earlier views, that Roe was wrongly decided, may inform the law of the land.
Abortion rights supporters would have little recourse
The minority of Democrat-appointed justices on the Supreme Court has little power in a court newly emboldened.
Meanwhile, the Republican minority in the Senate can squash any attempt to codify Roe into law.
The effort to overturn Roe v. Wade took nearly 50 years of hard work. The effort to remake courts or codify abortion into law could take a very long time too.
Not all Democrats support abortion rights
Sen. Joe Manchin, the West Virginia Democrat, opposes abortion rights and will not change Senate rules to codify Roe into law. That means there aren’t enough votes to change the rules, given that it’s a 50-50 Senate and Democrats need every vote.
General support for Roe and abortion rights
Americans, broadly, are supportive of Roe and abortion rights, although the details can vary with how pollsters ask the question.
The poll also asked how people would feel if the law was overturned, and the results suggest a large number of Americans would be frustrated:
- 14% – Happy.
- 12% – Satisfied.
- 25% – Dissatisfied.
- 35% – Angry.
- 14% – Wouldn’t care.
Americans do not speak with one voice on abortion
It’s true that a majority of Americans support protecting abortion rights, but it’s also likely those views vary by state.
In this way, Alito’s draft opinion to give power back to state legislators might find more supporters in certain portions of the country.
Much smaller minorities, 34% in Louisiana and 39% in Arkansas, said abortion should be legal in all or most cases. Abortion would face likely bans in those states.
In many parts of the country, support is about evenly split, including in the political battlegrounds of Texas and Georgia. Both states are among those that have passed extreme limits on abortion, which have already created a patchwork of access to abortion services.
How many abortions are performed each year?
The draft opinion, if it becomes law, would have a profound and immediate impact on women in the half of the country that may not have access to abortion services later this year.
Abortion-access states vs. abortion-ban states
If Roe is overturned, more than half of states, 26, could feature abortion bans, according to the Guttmacher Institute, which supports abortion rights.
A larger threat to privacy
President Joe Biden is not extremely comfortable talking about abortion. He supports protecting a woman’s right to choose an abortion as a policy matter but is a Catholic who opposes abortion personally.
Until Tuesday, according to CNN’s White House team, he had not used the word “abortion” as President. Talking to reporters about the draft opinion, he immediately broadened out the scope of the decision to argue Alito’s thinking could jeopardize other decisions, including the right to same-sex marriage.
“Even more equally as profound is the rationale used. And it would mean that every other decision relating to the notion of privacy is thrown into question,” Biden told reporters.
A new political reality
Democrats will seize again on women’s rights as a political issue, even as they have little they can tangibly deliver to protect the right to an abortion at the state level.
Republicans for now are trying to keep focus on the economy and not abortion, as they look to appeal to educated voters in the suburbs who are more likely to support abortion rights.
What does it all mean?
Women would undeniably have fewer rights. CNN legal analyst Carrie Cordero said on “Inside Politics” that the draft opinion would make women less free.
“If we can back up the lens, it means women in the 21st century are going to be less constitutionally protected than in the 20th,” she said.
Stop saying courts aren’t political. Another CNN analyst, Elliot Williams, said the draft opinion would disprove the increasingly naive idea that the nation’s courts are not driven by political belief.
“We’ve got to get off this idea that the Supreme Court is this apolitical body that exists outside of politics, when less than two years after a major personnel shift at the court, a major precedent is falling,” Williams said. “This idea that the court sort of exists outside and above it all — it’s just not reality.”
Analysis: Abortion rights on the brink: Catch up on the developments